10 Cars That Fell Short in Safety Standards

In the complex world of automotive safety, not all cars are created equal. While some vehicles are celebrated for their robust safety features and stellar crash-test ratings, others fall short of these critical standards. This article sheds light on a selection of vehicles that, despite their popularity or affordability, have notable safety shortcomings. From inadequate crash test performances to the absence of essential safety technologies, this list aims to inform and caution potential buyers about the lesser-known safety aspects of these widely recognized models.

Fiat Punto (2005-2018)

Image Editorial Credit: Darren Brode / Shutterstock.com

The Fiat Punto, particularly in its later years, raised safety concerns. In 2017, it received a 0-star Euro NCAP safety rating, a rare and alarming score for a modern car. This was due to the lack of standard-fit safety technologies like side airbags and electronic stability control, which are commonplace in other vehicles. The older design of the Punto also contributed to its poor performance in crash tests.

Chevrolet Spark (2013-2015)

Image Editorial Credit: Darren Brode / Shutterstock.com

The Chevrolet Spark, particularly the models from 2013 to 2015, scored lower in safety ratings compared to its competitors. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) gave it a “Poor” rating in the small overlap front crash test, highlighting concerns about the car’s ability to protect occupants in certain types of collisions.

Mitsubishi Mirage (2014-2019)

Image Editorial Credit: Foto by M / Shutterstock.com

The Mitsubishi Mirage has been criticized for its lack of safety features and poor crash test performance. The 2014-2019 models received low scores in the IIHS small overlap front test and were noted for their minimal active safety features, like basic airbag systems without advanced driver-assistance systems.

Jeep Wrangler (2007-2017)

Image Editorial Credit: Heinsdorff Jularlak / Shutterstock.com

The Jeep Wrangler, specifically models from 2007 to 2017, has shown safety vulnerabilities. Despite its rugged appearance, it scored poorly in the Euro NCAP crash tests, particularly in frontal impact tests. The lack of certain modern safety features, such as side airbags, also contributed to its lower safety ratings.

Ford Mustang (2015)

Image Editorial Credit: Darren Brode / Shutterstock.com

The 2015 Ford Mustang faced safety concerns, especially in its Euro NCAP crash tests, where it received a 2-star rating initially. This was mainly due to the lack of standard active safety features and poor protection for rear passengers. Ford responded by updating the European version with more safety equipment, improving its rating in later tests.

Dodge Grand Caravan (2011-2020)

Image Editorial Credit: Aaron of L.A. Photography / Shutterstock.com

The Dodge Grand Caravan, particularly older models, has been critiqued for its safety. The 2011-2020 models received only a 4-star overall rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), with concerns about side-impact protection for passengers.

Toyota Yaris (2006-2011)

Image Editorial Credit: Fingerhut / Shutterstock.com

The 2006-2011 Toyota Yaris models, while generally reliable, fell short in safety ratings. These models scored poorly in the IIHS side-impact crash tests, particularly models without side airbags, raising concerns about passenger protection in certain types of collisions.

Hyundai Accent (2012-2017)

Image Editorial Credit: Rob Wilson / Shutterstock.com

The Hyundai Accent from 2012 to 2017 faced safety challenges, especially in the small overlap front crash test conducted by the IIHS, where it received a “Poor” rating. The lack of advanced safety features in these models further contributed to concerns about occupant protection.

Fiat 500 (2008-2019)

Image Editorial Credit: Tupungato / Shutterstock.com

The Fiat 500, particularly older models, has had its share of safety concerns. The 2008-2019 models received lower crash test ratings from both the IIHS and Euro NCAP, particularly in side-impact and small overlap front crash tests. The car’s compact size and the absence of certain advanced safety features were factors in its lower safety performance.

Nissan Versa (2012-2019)

Image Editorial Credit: Caddy Man / Shutterstock.com

The Nissan Versa, specifically the 2012-2019 models, received less-than-stellar safety ratings. It scored poorly in the IIHS’s small overlap front test and was noted for a lack of standard active safety technologies. While reliable, the Versa’s safety features lagged behind other cars in its class.

This article originally appeared on MyCarMakesNoise.

More from MyCarMakesNoise

Top Picks for the Safest Small Cars on the Road

Image Editorial Credit: thefilipstehlik / Shutterstock.com

Size doesn’t always equate to safety, especially when it comes to the new generation of small cars hitting the roads. This article aims to debunk the myth that smaller cars can’t offer top-notch safety features. Read More.

Exploring the World`s Best Auto Shows

Image Editorial Credit: VanderWolf Images / Shutterstock.com

Whether you’re dreaming of the latest hypercars or a connoisseur of timeless classics, there’s an auto show out there that speaks your language. Read More.

Top American Muscle Cars for Drag Racing

Image Editorial Credit: Barry Blackburn / Shutterstock.com

In this exploration, we’ll spotlight the American muscle cars that have become legends on the drag strip, looking under the hood of each one to uncover what makes them the beasts they truly are. Read More.

Avatar photo

Author: Dave Johnston

Dave is a hands-on automotive technician with experience in performing service, diagnostics, and repairs on domestic and imported vehicles. He enjoys writing and sharing his knowledge far and wide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *