20 Compact Cars with Disappointing Fuel Economy

When you think of compact cars, fuel efficiency is often one of the top selling points. However, not all small cars live up to that expectation. In this article, we’re highlighting 20 compact cars that may seem efficient at first glance, but end up being surprisingly disappointing when it comes to fuel economy.

Mini Cooper S

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

Despite its compact size and sporty design, the Mini Cooper S has a turbocharged engine that craves fuel. With its 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, drivers are often disappointed to see fuel economy ratings around 26 MPG combined, which is lower than expected for a car of its size.

Fiat 500 Abarth

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Fiat 500 Abarth may be fun to drive, but its 1.4-liter turbocharged engine consumes more fuel than you’d expect for such a small vehicle. With an average of 24 MPG combined, it falls short of other compact cars that are known for better efficiency.

Ford Focus ST

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Ford Focus ST, with its 2.0-liter turbocharged engine, is designed for performance, but that comes at the cost of fuel efficiency. Drivers only get around 25 MPG combined, which is a bit underwhelming for a compact car aimed at both daily driving and sporty performance.

Chevrolet Sonic

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

While marketed as an affordable compact, the Chevrolet Sonic struggles with fuel efficiency. The 1.4-liter turbo engine offers just 27 MPG combined, which isn’t impressive when compared to other cars in its class.

Volkswagen GTI

Volkswagen GTI
Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Volkswagen GTI is beloved for its sporty handling, but its 2.0-liter turbocharged engine drinks fuel faster than many expect. At just 27 MPG combined, the GTI’s performance focus makes it a less efficient choice for a compact vehicle.

Subaru WRX

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Subaru WRX is a performance-oriented car with all-wheel drive, but its fuel economy suffers as a result. With an average of just 22 MPG combined, the 2.0-liter turbocharged engine isn’t ideal for drivers seeking fuel efficiency in a compact car.

Mazda3 Turbo

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Mazda3 Turbo may be quick off the line, but it lacks the fuel efficiency many expect from a compact car. Its 2.5-liter turbocharged engine delivers around 25 MPG combined, putting it at a disadvantage compared to more fuel-efficient rivals.

Hyundai Veloster Turbo

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

Despite its edgy design, the Hyundai Veloster Turbo has a disappointing fuel economy. Its 1.6-liter turbocharged engine only manages about 28 MPG combined, which isn’t stellar for a compact vehicle designed for sporty driving.

Honda Civic Type R

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Honda Civic Type R is renowned for its performance, but its 2.0-liter turbo engine is far from fuel-efficient. With an average of just 25 MPG combined, the Civic Type R sacrifices efficiency for speed, leaving drivers wanting more miles per gallon.

Nissan Juke

Nissan Juke
Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The quirky Nissan Juke is known for its unique style, but not for its fuel efficiency. Its 1.6-liter turbocharged engine averages only 29 MPG combined, making it less efficient than you’d expect from a small crossover.

Dodge Dart

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Dodge Dart’s fuel economy is underwhelming, especially with its 2.4-liter engine. Averaging only 27 MPG combined, the Dart’s performance doesn’t justify its subpar fuel efficiency in the compact segment.

Toyota Corolla Hatchback

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Toyota Corolla Hatchback may seem practical, but its fuel economy is less impressive than its sedan counterpart. With around 32 MPG combined, it falls behind other compacts in terms of efficiency, especially given Toyota’s reputation for fuel-saving cars.

Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer
Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

Although discontinued, the Mitsubishi Lancer is remembered for its poor fuel efficiency. Its 2.0-liter engine averages about 26 MPG combined, making it a letdown compared to other compact cars in its era.

Kia Forte GT

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Kia Forte GT offers a turbocharged 1.6-liter engine that sacrifices fuel efficiency for performance. With just 27 MPG combined, it’s less efficient than many other non-performance-oriented compact cars.

Buick Verano

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Buick Verano may offer a quiet and comfortable ride, but it lacks in fuel economy. Its 2.4-liter engine delivers just 24 MPG combined, which is low for a compact car in its class.

Jeep Renegade

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

Despite its compact size, the Jeep Renegade’s boxy design and off-road capability lead to poor fuel efficiency. The 2.4-liter engine offers only 24 MPG combined, making it one of the least efficient compact crossovers.

Chevrolet Trax

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Chevrolet Trax is a small SUV, but its 1.4-liter turbo engine still struggles with efficiency. With only 28 MPG combined, it falls short compared to other compact SUVs in the market.

Nissan Rogue Sport

Image Editorial Credit: Alexander Migl / Wikimedia Commons

The Nissan Rogue Sport is designed for urban adventurers, but its fuel economy is lacking. Its 2.0-liter engine delivers just 28 MPG combined, which is less than what you might expect from a small crossover.

Subaru Crosstrek

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Subaru Crosstrek may be versatile and practical, but its fuel efficiency doesn’t stand out. The 2.0-liter engine combined with all-wheel drive only delivers about 29 MPG, making it less fuel-efficient than many competitors.

Volkswagen Golf R

Image Editorial Credit: Shutterstock.com

The Volkswagen Golf R is known for its powerful 2.0-liter turbocharged engine and performance, but that comes at a cost. It averages just 24 MPG combined, which is disappointing for a compact car with a performance focus.

This article originally appeared in MyCarMakesNoise.

More from MyCarMakesNoise

20 Game-Changing Developments in Truck Manufacturing

Image Editorial Credit: Mr.choppers / Wikimedia Commons

Truck manufacturing has seen game-changing developments that have transformed the industry, making trucks more powerful, efficient, and versatile than ever before. From the integration of electric drivetrains and hybrid technology to advanced safety features like automatic braking and lane assist, these innovations are reshaping how trucks are built and driven. Read More

20 Best Backroads for a Peaceful Drive

Image Editorial Credit: Serge Skiba / Shutterstock.com

For those seeking a break from the hustle of city traffic, backroads offer a peaceful and scenic escape. These quiet routes wind through countryside, forests, and rolling hills, providing a serene atmosphere perfect for leisurely drives. Read More

Top 20 Fastest Cars That Have Ever Hit the Streets

Image Editorial Credit: 1933 Media Productions/ shutterstock.com

Speed has always been a thrilling aspect of automotive engineering, pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Some cars have set remarkable records, becoming legends in the world of high-performance vehicles. Read More

Avatar photo

Author: Dave Johnston

Dave is a hands-on automotive technician with experience in performing service, diagnostics, and repairs on domestic and imported vehicles. He enjoys writing and sharing his knowledge far and wide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *