20 Tire Brands That Aren’t Worth Your Money

When choosing tires, quality and performance are crucial for safety and comfort. Many budget tire brands like Westlake and Goodride often receive poor reviews due to issues like rapid tread wear, poor wet traction, and balancing problems. While these tires are inexpensive, their short lifespan and safety concerns make them less desirable options. Here’s a closer look at some common budget tire brands and their shortcomings.

Westlake Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Stefan Lambauer / Shutterstock.com

Westlake Tires often receive poor reviews due to their lack of durability and subpar performance in wet conditions. Customers frequently report premature tread wear and difficulty in balancing the tires, leading to vibrations and noise. Although they are affordable, their low price often results in a shorter lifespan and higher long-term costs due to frequent replacements.

Goodride Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Yura Tarasovskyy / Shutterstock.com

Goodride Tires are criticized for their inconsistent quality and poor performance in extreme weather conditions. Users have noted that these tires can be dangerous on wet or snowy roads, lacking the necessary traction. The tires are relatively inexpensive, but the frequent need for replacements and potential safety risks make them a poor choice for many drivers.

Chaoyang Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Sharif Putra / Shutterstock.com

Chaoyang Tires are typically inexpensive, but their quality and performance leave much to be desired. Users often report issues with balancing and a noisy ride. The tires’ tread tends to wear out quickly, and their performance in wet or icy conditions is often inadequate, leading to safety concerns.

Triangle Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Samusik Vladislav / Wikimedia Commons

Triangle Tires are frequently mentioned in customer reviews as being of low quality. Issues such as rapid tread wear, poor traction, and difficulty in balancing are common complaints. While they are priced attractively, their performance and reliability often fall short, making them a less desirable option for many drivers.

Giti Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Walter Eric Sy / Shutterstock.com

Giti Tires are known for their affordability, but this comes at the expense of quality and performance. Customers frequently report problems with balancing, rapid tread wear, and poor handling in wet conditions. The tires’ durability and overall reliability are often criticized, making them a less favorable choice.

Nankang Tires

Image Editorial Credit: tegarm10 / Wikimedia Commons

Nankang Tires are frequently criticized for their inconsistent quality and performance. Drivers have reported issues with balancing, rapid tread wear, and poor handling in adverse weather conditions. While they are priced competitively, their overall reliability and safety are often questioned.

Aeolus Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Walter Eric Sy / Shutterstock.com

Aeolus Tires are known for their low prices, but this often translates to compromised quality. Customers have reported problems with premature tread wear, poor traction, and a noisy ride. These issues can lead to an uncomfortable and potentially unsafe driving experience.

Sailun Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Walter Eric Sy / Shutterstock.com

Sailun Tires are another budget brand that often receives negative feedback. Drivers have reported issues with rapid wear, poor wet traction, and a noisy ride. The tires’ overall performance and reliability are often questioned, making them a brand to avoid despite their low price.

Kenda Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Ekaterina_Minaeva / Shutterstock.com

Kenda Tires are often avoided due to their poor performance and reliability. Customers frequently complain about rapid tread wear and a lack of traction on wet surfaces. While the initial cost is low, the tires’ short lifespan and the need for frequent replacements ultimately make them a costly option in the long run.

Linglong Tires

Image Editorial Credit: Vladimir Razgulyaev / Shutterstock.com

Linglong Tires are often criticized for their lack of durability and inconsistent quality. Many drivers have experienced rapid tread wear and poor handling characteristics. Despite being a budget-friendly option, the frequent need for replacements and the potential safety risks associated with these tires make them a poor investment.

Achilles Tire

Image Editorial Credit: Kristsanto / Shutterstock.com

Achilles tires are often chosen for their low prices, but customer reviews frequently mention problems with durability and performance. Common issues include rapid tread wear, poor grip in wet conditions, and frequent blowouts. The brand’s reputation for low-cost tires is overshadowed by these persistent reliability concerns.

Kumho Tire

Image Editorial Credit: Solarisys / Shutterstock.com

Kumho tires are often chosen for their affordability, but reviews frequently highlight issues with tread life and performance. Users report rapid wear and a general lack of grip, especially in wet or icy conditions. The brand’s reputation is also affected by frequent complaints about noise and vibration.

GT Radial

Image Editorial Credit: 8th.creator / Shutterstock.com

GT Radial tires are known for their lower prices, but customer reviews often point out significant shortcomings in quality and performance. Issues such as rapid tread wear, poor wet weather handling, and frequent balancing problems are common. Despite their cost-saving appeal, the reliability and safety concerns make them a less reliable choice.

Atlas Tire

Image Editorial Credit: Best Auto Photo / Shutterstock.com

Atlas tires are often chosen for their affordability, but customer reviews frequently mention problems with durability and performance. Common issues include rapid tread wear, poor grip in wet conditions, and frequent blowouts. The brand’s reputation for low-cost tires is overshadowed by these persistent reliability concerns.

Uniroyal Tire

Image Editorial Credit: Critical Labz / Shutterstock.com

Uniroyal tires, while more affordable, often receive poor reviews for their lack of durability and performance. Users frequently mention issues with traction and rapid tread wear, leading to concerns about their safety and reliability. Despite their attractive price point, these tires may end up costing more in the long run due to their short lifespan.

Riken Tire

Image Editorial Credit: The Image Engine / Shutterstock.com

Riken tires are typically associated with lower prices, but reviews often highlight their poor performance, especially in wet conditions. Users report frequent issues with tread wear and a general lack of durability. The brand’s cost-saving appeal is overshadowed by the frequent need for replacements and safety concerns.

Delinte Tire

Image Editorial Credit: Jeppe Gustafsson / Shutterstock.com

Delinte tires are known for their low prices, but they often fall short in terms of performance and longevity. Users frequently report rapid tread wear and poor traction, especially in wet or icy conditions. The brand’s reputation is also affected by complaints about noise and vibration. Despite being a cost-effective option, the safety risks and frequent need for replacements make Delinte tires a brand to avoid.

Ironman

Image Editorial Credit: Chris Allan / Shutterstock.com

Kelly Tire

Image Editorial Credit: Jon Kraft / Shutterstock.com

Kelly tires, a subsidiary of Goodyear, are often marketed as a budget-friendly alternative. However, customers report frequent issues with tread life and performance. Common complaints include rapid wear, poor handling, and susceptibility to blowouts. The brand’s reputation is further marred by problems with balancing and noise. Despite their lower price point, the potential safety risks and frequent replacements make them a less reliable choice.

Kingstar

Image Editorial Credit: 70_musclecar_RT+6 / Flickr

Kingstar tires, a subsidiary of the Hankook brand, are often chosen for their affordability but frequently fall short in terms of performance and durability. Customers report issues with rapid tread wear, poor handling, and susceptibility to blowouts. Reviews also highlight problems with noise and vibration, which can significantly impact driving comfort and safety. Despite their budget-friendly nature, the frequent need for replacements and associated safety concerns make Kingstar tires a less reliable choice.

This article originally appeared on MyCarMakesNoise.

More from MyCarMakesNoise

10 High-Speed Electric Motorcycles on the Market

Image Editorial Credit: Daniel Hartwig / Wikimedia Commons

Electric motorcycles have been gaining momentum in recent years, offering riders an eco-friendly alternative to traditional gasoline-powered bikes while still delivering thrilling performance. Read More.

20 Greatest Cars from Brands That No Longer Exist

Image Editorial Credit: Radoslaw Lecyk / Shutterstock.com

Some of the greatest cars come from brands that have unfortunately ceased to exist. These vehicles remain iconic, showcasing innovative designs and engineering that left a lasting impact on the automotive world. Read More.

20 Exhilarating Cars That Are Risky to Drive

Image Editorial Credit: VanderWolf Images / Shutterstock.com

Some cars are thrilling to drive but come with significant safety risks. Their high performance and exhilarating speed can lead to dangerous situations on the road. Read More.

Avatar photo

Author: Dave Johnston

Dave is a hands-on automotive technician with experience in performing service, diagnostics, and repairs on domestic and imported vehicles. He enjoys writing and sharing his knowledge far and wide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *